Art Is Lie That Brings Truth Nearer

Art Is Lie That Brings Truth NeargonrI resolved to evaluate the quotation by Pablo Picasso Art is a lie that brings us nearer to the loyalty because the claim contains several issues that, depending on the definition, may go across to further difficulties in interpretation. What do we mean by truth? What is a lie What do we mean by contrivances? Who do we get hold of when saying us? A piece of fraud, as a freestanding subject, is hermetically understood by every singular. It inspires us all, both creators and receivers of the nontextual matter leading to specific, personal, conclusions. Therefore, not only the main assumption but similarly the main outcome of the liberal arts is relativism that is wherefore we cannot state some(prenominal) supreme values in it. As Pablo Picasso once said You will not record arts as long as you wont understand that in arts 1+1 may give each result but 21. This underlines, I believe, that art is never equal to give an irresponsible a nswer, therefore is a lie in absolute terms. Hence, art outlines only the artists personal impression, his truth, and cannot be a measure of any unambiguous distinction between the absolute and impression itself. Since it is the quotation of Pablo Picasso that is evaluated in this essay, it can be explained in social intercourse to cubist conjecture of truth. The surmise claims the total truth is a sum of all perspectives. So the much than personal truths, in relativistic terms, or various lies (not hole truths), in absolute terms, are added, the closer one gets to k at one timeing the real truth. That is how the art is a lie that helps us examine the truth. I will certify up my thesis by analysing what kind of truth do paintings of Johannes Vermeer, a realist, capital of South Dakota Auguste Renoir, an impressionist, Edward munch, an expressionist, and Rij Rousseau, a cubist, tell me separately and altogether close women. These artists, and specific movements they re stu pefy, were elect because of the underlying contrast in both perceiving the truth and expressing it. They represent change approaches which will allow to present flaws in each suck up and key moderate conclusion, which falls into the thesis of the investigation.The painting The Milkmaid , by Vermeer, shows a woman standing in a kitchen, preparing a meal. Her caseful is pacify and it can be judged from her clothes and the content of the room that she lives in telling luxury. The painting presents somehow the reality of the 17th century social stain in Netherlands which gives me a social and historical truth concerning woman. Additionally, Vermeers truth well-nigh women is that they are the guardians of the households. His view falls into correspondence theory of truth, which claims that something is unbent if it corresponds to a fact. Despite recent XXth centurys social changes concerning womans position, they have always played a major role in taking care of home. The moveme nt itself is an suit of realism that comprises in the mimetic theory of art. The concept of mimesis assumes that the purpose of the art is to copy reality. Therefore the problem arises when evaluating realism- is it false because it deals with imitation, or it is true through paradox of fiction- that the model presents some regularities of human behavior? I believe that by taking from the character her personal identity in alter for creating a generalized model, Vermeer in fact hinders the personal truth about(predicate) this woman. He effectively presents the social order and historical truth, however generalisation is always concerned only with average, not with all possibilities.The painting adult female with a dog of Renoir presents a woman with a dog seance in the fastball. The blurry curves are used in order to show movement of the grass. By lifeing at the bloom and the reddish timber on a girl it can be judged it is a upstart afternoon. Renoirs truth in this paintin g applies only to womans look in a specific place at a specific time. Additionally, the painting says something personal about her- that she believably enjoyed spending her time close to the nature, since her face expresses joy, and that she probably enjoyed watching sun togs. The painting is an cerebrationl example of impressionism. As Childe Hassam4once notice The true impressionism is realism that so many people do not observe. The crucial difference, however, between these two concepts is that impressionism tries to prove that truth is not a generalisation, worry in realism. Instead, it uncovers the truth about certain objects in relation to very specific time and place. Therefore, impressionism withal falls into correspondence theory of truth since Renoirs painting corresponds to a fact- girls look during a sunset. However, since impressionists tried to enter the very glance we must ask ourselves how good truth is that? avocation Monets thoughts I assume that the truth a bout everything would be hindered in a series of glances. Thus, showing simply one of the uncountable in their number glances gives us only an insignificantly small part of the truth about women in general and the girl in particular.The painting Madonna by Edvard comminute presents a woman with sunken orbits and slender posture which makes her look like a demon. The foetus in the left corner symbolises fertility and therefore depicts woman as a source of life. Her face expresses experiencing ecstasy and by linking this image with the title of a piece, Madonna, which is the Christian perception of a sanctified mformer(a), Munch degraded the value of woman. The artist was a misogynist and his truth is that a woman is a source of all suffering, the mother of unorthodoxy and the incarnation of pure evil.6Expressionists, like Munch, disregarded mimetic approach to arts instead they wanted to show the world through the prism of their sustain perception. Thus, the basic idea in this m ovement was not to imitate reality (so they were not interested in absolutes), but to present the very native and very personal opinions- just as in the coherence theory of truth. The theory claims that a proposition is true if it fits in with our overall set of beliefs. Although the concept of woman being a demon could be true for Munch, for majority of people it would be perceived as extremist and discriminative view. However, expressionism, because of its fundamental assumptions, speaks more of the painter than of the world. Munchs perception derives from fear of woman that is why it is so narrow. Nevertheless, this narrowness is a deliberate action. Author, as an expressionist, through his working tells me This is MY truth, what is yours?The painting of Rij-Rousseau does not describe, as the title could suggested, the outer look. In depicting she depicted three disparate bodies which shows the Gordianity and diversity of womens nature. It can be cheerful and warm (orange), or impassive and cold (green), and there is also the person between them, poorly visible, brown- imitating the whole uncertainty and mystery of other womans embodiments. Rousseaus truth about woman is hidden in symbols the green face resembles a mask, so the outer look, which would mean that the blithe person represents the sexual nature of woman. Therefore, the painting represents the very essence of the cubist theory of truth-to present the object in the widest context possible by considering it from multiple viewpoints. In other words cubism assumes that we are getting closer to the truth the more perspectives we get to know. But now again, how good truth is that? I now realize that the absolute truth about woman means summing up all the personal truths about each woman separately, yet it is an unachievable task. Furthermore, any attempt to draw a mathematically moderate view about woman would mean going back to the very beginning, so the concepts of generalization and mimesis . Therefore, what is gained through dealing with arts is not only finding out how great is our own ignorance, but also how unattainable to comprehend, and impracticable to depict, the absolute truth is.What have I gained through dealing with the paintings of Vermeer, Renoir, Munch and Rousseau? The Milkmaid told me what the social status in Netherlands was in XVIIth century. Renoir immortalised some girls look at the time of a sunset, the emotions that her face expressed and the move of the grass around her. Munch told me of his greatest despise and fear of women. Rousseau showed not to cuss the first impression because a woman is a very complex being. Therefore, I am wiser with the views of these four paintings, bur now I realise I am poorer with the lack of the perceptions depicted in another thousands paintings. Thus, I know that I know nothing8of the absolute truth about woman, since I just grasped only an idea of the truths complexity. When Picasso said that art is a lie tha t helps us realise the truth I believe he didnt mean any specific style, i.e. he didnt mean that realism is a lie, but that all the achievements in arts, in all styles and assumptions, are just not complete. Having in mind that Picasso actually created cubism, I cant fend evaluating his claim in relation to cubist theory of truth. According to this idea the absolute truth is a mosaic composed of various elements individual approaches. In other words, what Picasso meant is that arts is closed in specific boundaries of different styles and cannot present the whole picture, therefore is a lie. However, as new forms and concepts are created the more perspectives are added and, piece by piece, the mosaic is being completed.