Organization and Management Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2000 words

Organization and Management - Essay fontScientific management, in contrary, was from Fredrick Taylor in the year 1911. In a more simple term it is state to be amongst the best bureaus duties could be executed and the best method to use in change the methods or techniques practiceed by employees (Robbins p.38) A bunch of comparisons have been done for the two methods of management, for instance specialization, atomisation and mechanization of work. Moreover, inadequate skilled and intellectual content will hasten the current work. Mechanization of fordisms big performance further stressed a number of Taylors accepted beliefs of management beingness separated from human emotions and affairs, applying humans as instruments or machines to be manipulated by their leaders (Hersey p.84). There was violence and bl completioning by crosswayism for scientific techniques to have things done according to Fords flourishing work out of mass production. There were differences between the two methods of management. Fordism dehumanized employees while the other method persuaded the employees that their objectives could be well achieved together with their employees goals, thus they should strive towards this flush. Fords method was appropriate for firms that participated in huge production, dissimilar scientific management method that could be employed by many firms. Big companies like Ford motors put these methods in practice. The two theories of management show companies on what technique of management they should employ today. Employers should have it away that their employees should be treated fairly with democracy. Since 1970s, wide changes in technology and market have made employers and producers to employ greater diversification in production and more flexibility in production methods. Movements in the direction of a flexible organization became apparent. For instance, organizations like Toyota, NASA and Nissan act as contemporary examples of Fordism and p ortray movements to the direction of scientific management. Similarities that are there between the two theories are Fordisms mass production mechanization and Taylors efforts of using workers like machines. Fredrick planned this by the use of management principles that included science development for every(prenominal) element and looking for the fastest method the responsibility could be executed. Fords best kinds of his production system was inclusive of dedicated and fixed machine use in individuals duty, kinda than making workers machines (Hollinshead, 1995). As Taylor tried to show the globe that science existed in management and the fastest way was a better way, he pointed out incompetence in managers for being inefficient in track of factories and railroads. Using motions and time studies, Fredrick attained increased production of up to twice the injection (Dunphy, 1998, p.4). Taylors thoughts were answered by others at a 1910 ICC hearing, Brandeis reiterated that America s railroads was in a position to save 1 trillion dollars in a day in case they adopted scientific management method in their operations (Oakes, 1996).Fredrick Taylor proved to the globe that the scientific and methodical study of duty or work could end up with an improved effectiveness. He believed definition of clear guidelines for employees would improve the goods production. Fordism just like