Community-based Policing: The Future of Law Enforcement :: Law Enforcement Essays

OUTLINEThesisCommunity-based policing provides hope for the future of Law enforcement.I. Introduction to C.B.P.A.The roots of C.B.P.B.So what is community?II.The two elements of C.B.P. law enforcementdoctrine areA. Community partnership.B. Problem solving.III. The reaction of police to change.IV. The future of C.B.P.A. A first step in C.B.P.B. Measuring success.C. Crime prevention.V. Conclusion.INTRODUCTION TO COMMUNITY-BASED POLICING."In Philadelphia, a pulsating tavern juke box that has caused irate neighbors tolog 500 Police calls in six months, was moved away from a common wall with the nigh building. (Author unknown US News) The calls stopped. Though it seemssimple, such a move is at the heart of what we know as Community-based Policing.The movement toward C.B.P. has gained momentum in recent years. As Police andcommunity leaders search for more effective ways to enhance the sense of publicsafety and the quality of life in their communities. We select accepted C.B.P inone p olice department after another,and we are ready now to agree that "C.B.P.provides hope for the future of Law enforcement." We can succeed the seed of C.B.P.back to Sir Robert Peel, the father of the modern Police system, who said "thePolice is the public and the public are the Police"(Braiden). For differentreasons, the Police lost plenty of that principle defining their relationshipwith the public. Modern historians have said that the reform era in government,which started in the 1900s to combat corruption, along with the move toward theprofessional go out of police work, resulted in the separation of Police andCommunity (Kelling, Moore, pg-5)Reform style Policing emerged in the 50s and 60s with rotating shifts andfrequent movement of officers, (to prevent corruption). Random patrolling (areactive police technique) was in addition detrimental to the link between Police andpublic. The police adopted a policy of centralized control to ensure compliancewith set sta ndards, and to encourage a professional aura of impartiality. Allthese policies along with the use of automobiles, telephones, and othertechnological advances helped distance the Police more. The calls for serviceincreased as urban population and offense awareness increased, making the policealmost totally reactive. The introduction of computers only encouraged thatfalse idea of "quick" reactive response and a statistical view toward measuringsuccess in policing(rather than analyzing the local needs of the community.)By the late 70s the communities had become a diverse pool of nationalities,subcultures, and attitudes. People identified themselves as parts of separategroups and at times the Police was not part of what they called "us. Duringthis time, a burst of new ideas and changes in the sociopolitical and economic